Thread: water damage
View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:09 PM
chronster's Avatar
chronster
i like turtles
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,102
Reputation: 2365
chronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIPchronster is a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: water damage

LOL You both used the jump off a cliff line, and you're telling ME I have no character? Sheep.

Maybe you should read the thread before posting: I haven't had water damage to my phone. I haven't had to replace my phone. And if I get what I pay for, then yes, I am paying for insurance which covers a replacement. If it gets wet, then isn't that funny, I just lost it as well.

Lets just be clear: I've never done this. When I was with tmobile, I payed 100 bucks for a new phone instead of 50 for a refurb because my phone fell in a pool. With Sprint, it's a different story. I hate sprint, they've screwed me and if I ever have an opportunity to screw them back I'll take it without a second thought.

Get off your high horse and stop making such a big deal about this. People are paying for insurance, they should be able to get a refurb at the very least.

It's people like you who denied katrina victims the money they deserved. "It could have been flood damage from the levies, or it could have been flood damage from the hurricane. It's probably from the levies, DENIED"