true, the iPhone is indeed a solid phone, it's just not our shot of rum.
and CNET's bias is evident (not just the random reviewers that fake post).. just look what they've given all the big htc devices that came out
http://reviews.cnet.com/cell-phone-r...col;srt&rpp=50
Mogul, touch diamond/pro, g1, touch, and sony xperia x1 all received a 3.5... they cannot say the pro deserves the same rating as the mogul (i'm in heaven right now compared to when i had my mogul) - that's just insane... you know what makes them even more of a hypocrite? They gave the tilt a 4! Okay so the tilt came out a couple months after the mogul and had improved features... so what happened between the tilt and the touch pro? Why would the rating go down when all the features have been improved? It's madness i tell you, madness. Hell, the centro even got 3.5 stars... anyone wanna trade their pro in for the palm centro? i mean... they got the same rating, so they must be equal right? They can give the iPhone (that had many problems at launch, also when they reviewed it) and blackberryies 4 stars, but can't give WM work horses like the pro/diamond 4s? I will not be surprised if they give the Touch HD less than 4 stars... Then again maybe their bias lies within sprint/cdma phones.. hmmm.