View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2008, 01:23 AM
snovvman's Avatar
snovvman
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Threadstarter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 456
Reputation: 1190
snovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on repsnovvman is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Two more ways to save battery (if solutions can be found)

Thanks cappy. I don't disagree. I was hoping that, by not loading the driver, the sensor itself would actually not be "activated" or powered up. Sort of like keeping WiFi off, if the sensor can be kept powerered off, I'd imagine there would be some savings. Although the polling "event" only blips the CPU a small amount, the sensor device would be draining power all the time (since, I assume, it is always "on" in order to report the change in state?).

Thanks again for taking the time to write. You made very good points.
Reply With Quote