Quote:
Originally Posted by Chef Ben
Well I'm glad everyone is a paper-critic...and nothing more. Lets look at the real world here. 4mm thicker is a significant difference when its used day in and day out. Trust me, you will definitely be able to tell and it will make a difference. What makes you think the CDMA Touch Pro will will stay the same size as the GSM version? You claim that someone has held a CDMA Touch Pro? Where? I have never seen any evidence of that. In all probability, the CDMA Diamond & Touch Pro will share the same respective size differences as their GSM counterparts.
This hype/delay combo is getting ridiculous. It gives this forum too much time to over-analyze and conspire and flat out make things up. Then the deprived masses instantly jump on the nonsense thats been spewed like flies on...well, you know.
|
1. You should read more. Read some other forums besides this one. (Though I think it *was* ppcgeeks where I first saw the first person who actually held the CDMA Touch Pro talk about it.).
Edit: Here, I found it:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread...518#post387518 and I've seen similar info posted on another site too.
2. The Touch Pro is smaller than my Treo 700wx... so no it won't be a problem in my pocket. The Treo is no problem. 4mm is almost nothing. You'd get used to it...and it actually may be less than 4mm as per someone who has actually handled both phones at the same time.
3. I agree about the nonsense being spewed...that's why I DID something about it to show people the different between the Diamond GSM, Diamond CDMA, and the Touch Pro GSM.
Since I made that graphic I HAVE read where someone did handle the Touch Pro and confirmed that it is only a tiny bit thicker and in HIS opinion it made no difference. He suggested that it might be 2mm thicker, but I'll leave it at between 2 to 4mm thicker until we actually get some better leaked specs.
Too many people were b!tching about the Touch Pro CDMA being too big when in fact it isn't going to be much bigger than the Diamond CDMA.