View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2008, 06:05 PM
land2634's Avatar
land2634
Halfway to VIP Status
Offline
Location: San Angelo, TX
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 536
Reputation: 570
land2634 knows their stuffland2634 knows their stuffland2634 knows their stuffland2634 knows their stuffland2634 knows their stuffland2634 knows their stuff
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to land2634
Re: AT&T says what? Now FCC will take on AT&T over P2P clampdown and acct termination

AT&T did something similar in my area (San Angelo, TX) about 2 years ago. They were getting ready to move into the area, and even though they didn't have a physical store yet, they were allowing customers to sign up for service on their website. This was when roaming was becoming a big deal, yet you couldn't have more than half of your usage on roaming. Well, as it turns out, it took until just a few months ago for AT&T to finally arrive in town. In the meantime, over the last several years, they sent letters to customers telling them they had a month to find a new carrier. So many customers who were already fed up with Sprint and Alltell (no Verizon Wireless here) were now told that even though AT&T's page said it was home coverage, that indeed it was not. Always seemed pretty crappy to me, especially for the customer base that used PPC/Smartphone devices, as it became more costly to them to move carriers.
Reply With Quote