Thread: Whisteblower on person selling 6.1 software and service
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:49 PM
gguruusa's Avatar
gguruusa
Deep Thinker
Offline
Location: Mountain top
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,252
Reputation: 4726
gguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributions
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Whisteblower on person selling 6.1 software and service
Unless he managed to create his ROM without the use of a BuildOS.exe, it's illegal. In case you missed it, USING BUILDOS (any of them) IS NOT ALLOWED UNDER THE LICENSE TERMS FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. The ROM is instrumental to the service being provided, so the BuildOS license applies. For the same reason, Microsoft could pursue. Even though you may only be performing a service, you are still bound by the licensing of the products integral to your service.
__________________
Grammar: The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.
Reply With Quote