View Single Post
  #3607 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:22 PM
boggsie's Avatar
boggsie
b00nsquad
Offline
Location: Central Ohio
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,359
Reputation: 2295
boggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIPboggsie is a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: No2Chem nueROM 2.0 (WM6.1) Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by belvedere View Post
i'm not that familiar with kitchens, but is there anything that different than downloading the nbh file and using an empty RUU (like i have been doing)? from what i can tell it seems like i could do more of my own customizations....
If I understand the thought you are expressing / questioning ...

path a = install an 'empty' *.nbh file and then after the rom is installed use *.cab files to individually install all of your applications

path b = use the kitchen to build an *.nbh file which includes all of your applications (as OEM's available in the kitchen)

Obviously, either path is valid as long as it arrives at the destination you desire.

Differences ... in favor of using a kitchen method seems to be the amount of time it takes to manually add on applications via *.cab files ... that time is saved by building the applications into the rom, via the kitchen. Another advantage seems to be that there are more things available as add-ons to a kitchen than are lying around as installable / configurable *.cab files.

Differences ... against using a kitchen seem to be the fact that the established cookers (DCD, no2chem, NexVision, VetVito, etc.) are going to turn out reliable rom's. Tweaking a kitchen can be intimidating at first. I may sound very confidant, but as recent as yesterday I was in chat at ppckitchen.org with Colonel and I was so overwhelmed that I couldn't even formulate a reasonably intelligent question.

Last edited by boggsie; 03-25-2008 at 10:26 PM.
Reply With Quote