Thread: whos to blame?
View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2012, 05:07 PM
orangekid's Avatar
orangekid
Awesomenss :)
Offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,973
Reputation: 7530
orangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the communityorangekid is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to orangekid Send a message via MSN to orangekid Send a message via Yahoo to orangekid
Re: whos to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl View Post
Sam could lose more if they tarnish the Sammy name. And they would have still sold to verzion why becuz they are the number 1 android phone maker Verizon would have been the only ones with out s3

Sent from my Galaxy S III using Forum Runner
except that there's probably less than .1% who care about an unlocked bootloader.

Do you know in real life a single person on verizon who even knows what a bootloader is?

Sammy is developer friendly up to the point where VZW is asking them to lock the BL, then I can see why they'd lock it in a one time only basis than deal with a mexican standoff.


HTC has been doing it for every device on every network.
Reply With Quote