View Single Post
  #1338 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2012, 11:01 AM
arrrghhh's Avatar
arrrghhh
Testing Extraordinaire
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,604
Reputation: 7360
arrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [TESTING] - NAND OMGB (1.2.3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbellot View Post
Maybe. But I also honestly think there is something fundamentally messed up with the charge/discharge logic.
If you only understood how difficult batt algo's actually are... I'm sure it's messed up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by milda25 View Post
I do not understand why you keep defending the claim that OMGB, LK or the kernel has a problem with power management. SD series has much better battery life (at least 24 hours) while running Android from the SD card in the background doing the same things as NAND series. I do not know what the problem is, but I am sure that something certainly is.
Claiming that nobody forces me to use the Android is not very constructive. Android is a great OS, I want to use it and I am very glad that there are people who provide porting for our old devices. WinMo is a dead platform for me.
I understand that there is still plenty of things to deal with, but over time the power management to have someone take a look. Any problem there certainly is.
Then fix it! I never said there's not a bug, just that you should never expect, even if all else is equal, for WinMo and Android to get the exact same battery run times! Yeesh. You guys need to put up or shut up is all I'm saying.

Last edited by arrrghhh; 02-28-2012 at 11:09 AM.
Reply With Quote