Thread: Why Aren't People Using WM5?
View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2008, 02:12 PM
Baffles's Avatar
Baffles
Noob
Offline
Location: Upstate New York
  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,514
Reputation: 10143
Baffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation levelBaffles can't get a higher reputation level
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Baffles
Re: Why Aren't People Using WM5?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EtherealRemnant View Post
1999TL, that is true, however if you have a program that needs 15MB of RAM and Windows is only reporting 12MB to be free, even if its just cached, that program won't run...
That's because the program sucks. Programs shouldn't check reported free memory, they should just take what they need and let Windows worry about free ram. That is, after all, the whole point of it.
Reply With Quote