Re: Oh No! Is anyone with 3D going to Samsung S II ???
gTen I've seen you claim this often, but you are comparing an underclocked phone with broken drivers pushing 33% more pixels so of course by current methods it will appear to be inferior, as to raw specs the adreno220 actually triangulates more and general cpu/gpu performance is tantamount. Let's bench the Hercules vs the GS2 and then you can start naming stats, as it stands before custom ROMs and HTC OTAs the GS2 will outperform the 3D, but that has nothing to do with hardware. The vibrant had good hardware but runs stock like shit and similarly would be unfair for me to say that the hummingbird is fubar because you can't even slide screens without insane lag on a cappy or a vibrant.
Personally I chose not to go with the 3D because the 3D seems gimmicky, I don't need 2 five MP cameras, and I don't need all this 3D crap draining my battery, I also hate both the 3D and Sensation stock ROMs and neither one is optimized to take advantage of the asynchronous cores.
If you need better performance NOW then get an SGS2, if you want a phone with hardware that more devs and game/app makers will support then hang on to your 3D. I don't see EA and all the big namers making games specifically optimized for the exynos.
I also like SLCD qHD more than SAMOLED+ WVGA but that's a personal preference.
|