View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:08 PM
themuffinman's Avatar
themuffinman
Shop smart, shop S-MART!!
Offline
Location: Jonesboro Ga
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,387
Reputation: 2615
themuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIPthemuffinman is a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Post 3.35.04 Radio speeds here

Quote:
Originally Posted by indagroove View Post
I tried with the rev A in EPST both "disabled" (stock) and "enabled" (modified). I did these tests from my house in Santa Cruz, CA where I get 2 or 3 bars of signal. I tested to Los Angeles, San Jose, and San Francisco twice each way. This is tethered to my pc through usb internet sharing.

stock ("disabled"):
LA - 768/269 -- 579/223
SJ - 628/424 -- 526/241
SF - 620/268 -- 699/345

"enabled":
LA - 497/130 -- 772/121
SJ - 900/124 -- 702/132
SF - 480/101 -- 741/106

I did a couple of tests via wifirouter on my pc, and the results were surprisingly faster than usb.

You can see that the ESPT settings in stock configuration allowed faster upload speeds and generally the same download speeds as "enabling" rev A via EPST.

Dude, you aren't the only one. When I run speedtests I actually get around the same 2200k down and 400k up but when I am actually downloading stuff and web browsing, running wmwifirouter is alot smoother as faster than tethering usb style.
Reply With Quote