Thread: I hate Engadget
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2011, 11:38 AM
Riley's Avatar
Riley
Retired Staff
Offline
Location: Pittsburgh
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,767
Reputation: 14070
Riley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation levelRiley can't get a higher reputation level
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: I hate Engadget

Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitemethod View Post
Guys, read my post better, I stated they compare the battery life with the iphone often, which the screen on both EVO's is basically an 1" bigger. Not that, the EVO 4G and EVO 3d is different. I know those are the same.
ok, sounds good. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by john80hotkey View Post
he made references to the iphone so I dont think he was comparing the screen to the evo OG he said from 3" to 4" is a big difference and sure to make the battery die faster.

I was also disappointed with the engadget review I had high hopes for the 3d and they slammed it.. when comparing it to most 4g high end android phones the battery seemed to be on par with most models with some fairing a little better than others. I think gsm technology has less of an impact on battery life too vs cdma.. just an assumption. I wasnt expecting everyone to just score it perfectly just cause it was a evo even other reviews I read that had negative comments towards it didnt seem as bad as engadget made it to be
Agreed, I guess in the end it doesn't matter what Engadget thinks. All that matters is what the 3d owners feel about it and they will be more informed with day to day usage.
Reply With Quote