View Single Post
  #2626 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:35 AM
arrrghhh's Avatar
arrrghhh
Testing Extraordinaire
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,604
Reputation: 7360
arrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: NAND Testing - 05-25 Update: New LK, Recovery.img, Kernel Updates through Recover

Quote:
Originally Posted by muziling View Post
Hello ACL, I notice .39 kernel's owner is you, and .39 kernel is better than NAND kernel for experiance. Do you plan to update NAND kernel to .39
I've tried to coax him into this, but it's a big task. There's still quite a bit of difference between the .39 HaRET kernel and the existing kernel we run on NAND. From what has been explained to me, it would be exceedingly difficult to have just one kernel for both since HaRET has to do some hackey things to get stuff functional, and with NAND ACL is doing his best to stick to what native devices do/use.
Reply With Quote