Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDynamite
lol, like I said, you're a real piece of work. I point out that the Sensation finished significantly faster in a performance test, yet still scored lower. You, after arguing that the test is not valid, continue to argue why this test IS valid, and make a bunch of excuses for why this happened, and then say i'm the one making excuses. The bottom line is- the Sensation finished the quadrant bech test significantly faster than the Galaxy S 2. Period. Now you trying to justify that is not ME making excuses, but rather it is YOU making excuses as to WHY it happened.
|
I think you are mistaken...I do not need to justify anything or give excuses for anything..Quadrant clearly gave SGS2 a higher score PERIOD..you can say whatever you want but according to Quadrant the SGS 2 is faster then the Evo 3d...
The only thing I was trying to explain to you was how quadrant works and why the score is what it is..for YOUR educational purpose. The fact of the matter is SGS 2 won in Quadrant..if you do not wish to hear why thats your choice.
Quote:
|
I know it is different. Never said otherwise. Doesn't change a thing. The bottom line is if you are testing the processing power on a device, it isn't a fair test if one is emulating a different resolution.
|
they arent emulating..they are rendering at the resolution set to them..if you set them to render at same resolution they will produce accurate benchmarks.
Quote:
|
You are the one denying the facts here. But carry on making up your own world to live in. I'm done wasting time on you.
|
Yes, in my world 3000 > 1600 I do not know why thats different in yours :/