Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDynamite
One of the devices finished significantly faster, yet the device that didn't finish any of the tests faster scored higher. Period. If we're measuring performance, the faster device was not the one that scored higher.
|
Do you even know how quadrant works? see..this is why I say your in denial of facts..stop trying to change reality to your own liking..fact of matter is..they finished the test at SAME SPEED..only I/O was slower..but since I/O is not very important the SGS scored a higher score.
So while I would agree that the resolution had an effect on the quadrant score (for 2d and 3d scores, not cpu, I/O and memory scores)..the time it finished is irrelevant...stop trying to make something out of something that isn't there...
Quote:
|
Again, you demonstrate your ignorance on this subject and continue to pass it off as a fact. I have an old Mitsubishi HDTV collecting dust in my garage right now that does 1080i and 480p, but does NOT do 720p. It obviously has the pixels if it can do 1080i, it obviously has the fps if it does 480p. Yet it can't do 720p. Please explain how this is possible if it does not require any additional processing power...
|
Must we really get into a lengthy discussion on the difference between 'p' and 'i'? but for kicks is it an LCD or an DLP?