Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Quadrant does CPU test, memory test, 2D GPU test, 3D GPU test, I/O test..which test did it finish faster?
I timed the tests myself and you can check it yourself..the difference was on the I/O test taking 6 seconds longer (prob because there is more a lot more rom, but thats irrelevant)..I am not telling you to exclude anything I am telling you to separate and judge each test individually..
This is called flat out denial of the truth...as the evidence is there..no excuses...the only test that finished faster is I/O..all other tests they finished equally but the SGS 2 had higher FPS and a higher overall score..the end..
|
One of the devices finished significantly faster, yet the device that didn't finish any of the tests faster scored higher. Period. If we're measuring performance, the faster device was not the one that scored higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
ummm tvs include a certain amount of pixels..you cant do 1080p if the physical pixel count isnt there..that doesnt mean you cant play 1080p content it will just be rescaled to 720p physical resolution.
If I display 720p on a 1080p TV without rescaling..and 720p on a 720p TV the processing is equal..TVs only lately have had atom chips put in..so far they have been pretty dumb machines with little/no processing power...
|
Again, you demonstrate your ignorance on this subject and continue to pass it off as a fact. I have an old Mitsubishi HDTV collecting dust in my garage right now that does 1080i and 480p, but does NOT do 720p. It obviously has the pixels if it can do 1080i, it obviously has the fps if it does 480p. Yet it can't do 720p. Please explain how this is possible if it does not require any additional processing power...