Thread: Evo 4g/Evo 3D
View Single Post
  #144 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2011, 05:03 PM
BlackDynamite's Avatar
BlackDynamite
VIP Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,839
Reputation: 1190
BlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Evo 4g/Evo 3D

Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen View Post
like the flawed argument that quadrant finished faster when in reality it didn't?
It absolutely did too finish faster. You're the one making excuses saying to exclude certain parts of the test in order to make it seem like it didn't finish faster. But anyone who watches it can easily see that it finished significantly faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen View Post
TVs hardly have any processing power..on an LCD screen it is irrelevant as all pixels are on all the time via back lighting..then a color is displayed via liquid crystals and color filter...



Now the only thing that requires anything extra is "rescaling" as re-scaling is not done..its the same thing....
You are totally wrong. If you change the resolution, the tv absolutely has to process it. That's why not all tv's can even do it.
Reply With Quote