Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
no it doesn't...math has no resolution..your assuming that all things must have a display, that is not how programming works. In programming everything has no resolution, its just code, then that code is sent to the display driver and rendered at set resolution. Linpack has none of that...its a pure CPU benchmark, it even exists outside of cellphones and strictly measures CPU.
|
Wrong again. When you create an Android app, the SDK absolutely DOES specify the resolution(s) that the app will run at. Again, I am trying to decide if you are just misinformed and incorrectly stating your opinion as fact, or if you are blatanly lying in order to "win" an internet debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
It tinkers with resolution on both..its similar to using the "depth app" or setting resolution on your pc desktop...display is irrelevant, whats most important is at what resolution its rendered at.
|
Display is absolutely relevant. If a device is running at it's optimal resolution, it is going to perform better than the next device which is wasting CPU power to emulate a different resolution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
First of all you have to realize that they are using Quadrant, not Quadrant Pro...the score from Quadrant is an overall score...things that go into Quadrant score is CPU, memory, GPU 2D, GPU 3D....
|
So what. The point of the test is to test performance, correct? That is the whole reason for running the test. So when I see a device finish significantly faster, i know it performs better. If the score says otherwise, then the score is wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Second of all the SGS 2 hanged on the I/O which caused it to start later then the Sensation on the GPU test.
|
More excuses. The Sensation finished first. Why it finished first doesn't matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Third of all, finish faster is pointless unless it achieves it at the same FPS, if it finishes faster at a lower FPS means its frame skipping..and if you look at the video, frame skipping is apparent...tats why I even looked at the FPS in the first place, because I saw frame skipping...
|
Bull. Like I have said a million times now, the Sensation was running at a significantly higher resolution. Lower FPS is expected with a higher resolution. If the devices were running the same resolution and one had a higher fps, then you might have a point. But to keep harping on the higher fps on the device with a lower resolution is ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
and what your saying is not an excuse? can we just call it a day and say Quadrant is flawed..its a well known fact...
|
Quadrant is flawed, yes. But smartbench is too. And no, I'm not making excuses for it. I said from the beginning that I didn't take any of those benchmarks too seriously. You are the one who said the Galaxy S 2 clearly had the hardware advantage and started referencing bench tests as this clear proof. So I was merely pointing out that some of these bench tests actually show the Sensation as the faster device. You are saying you don't take those tests seriously, I am saying I don't hold smartbench on some mythical higher level. It has its flaws too, even if you liek to pretend they don't exist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Ok..so you want to play it like that..then we can both agree that the GPU in the Evo3d and Sensation is "too weak" as it was not able to achieve 60 fps....it is irrelevant which one has higher resolution or lower resolution because when you are playing a game or using your GPU it has to perform at 60fps to get a smooth lag free experience...
|
What a bunch of bull. We both know darn well that any time you increase resolution, your fps WILL drop. For you to say resolution is irrelevant is just complete crap. Here is what we can say- the Galaxy S 2's GPU is "too weak" to support the qhd resolution. I don't care what fps it achieves at a lower resolution. What's next- you tell me 480i (sd on a tv) is better than 1080p (full hd on a tv) because 480i runs at 30 fps, while most 1080p only runs at 24 fps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
or we can agree that Quadrant is flawed..your call...
|
Or we can just agree that at best you don't know what you're talking about and like to pretend you do, or at worst you sre just full of crap and blatantly lying. Your call. And again, I said quadrant was flawed from the start. You honestly don't remember me saying the Sensation finished first and somehow still scored lower? This is why I am done replying to you. You know darn well i said quadrant was flawed, and there is not one post where I said otherwise. Yet you say crap like that. Again, for the record, ALL of those bench tests are flawed in some way.