Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
1) prefect blacks
2) 60,000+ contrast
3) 4% screen reflect
4) 69 - 83 brightness contrast
5) 2.36 gamma intensity
6) infinite contrast ratio
7) 0 power displaying blacks
 1000x faster response time over lcds
9) better viewing angles
10) lower power consumption on all colors except white
11) can operate and lower and higher temperatures then lcds |
Please tell me why I should care about this nonsense. You rattle off some random stats of an OLED. Like I said, if you are going to tell me the Galaxy S 2 has a more efficient screen than the Evo 3D, then tell me how efficient each of them are. You are just making crap up at this point. Well, not at this point, you've been doing it all along.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
OLED is the tech after LCDs...right now you see LCD tvs with 3d and etc..2012+ is gonan be the year of OLED TVs..right now OLED TVs cost too much like 10,000$ for a 30" screen...
|
So? Why should I care about this? You keep cluttering up the discussion with crap that has nothing to do with this. OLED tv's are generally better than LCD has absolutely nothing to do with either of these phones. And even if it was somehow related, not EVERY OLED tv is better than EVERY LCD. I'll take a 75" top notch LCD tv with glasses free 3D over a 13" OLED tv with no 3D, every time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
I said facebook AND image sites...and as I said HTC has a history of having sub par cameras..where as the SGS 2 has a camera that even beats the iphone 4 and etc..not suprsing as unlike HTC, Samsung actually manufactures cameras!
|
First off, HTC doesn't make "sub par" cameras. The camera on the Evo is just fine. Yeah, you may have to adjust some settings in order to get a better picture, but it is very much possible to get good quality out the Evo camera. It's certainly on par or better than the Droid cameras.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
I know skype right now does not use 1080p video but it will in the near future, and there are techs that do support 1080p video, you also can use it for better self portraits and etc..I mean many things dont support 3d and you have no problems touting that...
|
There are way, WAY more people ready to make use of 3D cameras and a glasses free 3D screen, than there are ready to make use of a 2 megapixel video chat from a phone. There is literally no video chat client that runs on Android that will stream a 2 megapixel video stream. And there is no client that will receive and display such a stream anyway. No comparison here. You were obviously biased and just making crap up when you said the 3D cameras on the Evo were an unknown, the 3D screen was a tie, and the front camera on the Galaxy S 2 was better due to the more megapixels. The bottom line is, everything you can do with the Sammy front cam can be done with the Evo 3D front cam. But the sammy will never take the 3D pics and vids that the Evo 3D takes, nor will it ever display the 3D videos, or the high resolution of the Evo 3D screen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
First of all its optional..second of all...he is not suppose to do nand backups..you have something called "remote syncing"....no one does nand backups in corporate environments...
|
Remote syncing is not the same thing. Nice try though. So, like I said and you chose to dodge the answer rather than admit it- encrypted nand is a bad thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Yes they can but you also have to realize that while they can buy components from other sources..other sources dont just go throwing out latest components either..they first release "prototypes" for testing then have the buyers like HTC make orders...Samsung can skip this entire lengthy process and just manufacture it out the gate..thats a HUGE advantage...not to mention Samsung has patents on components they release which prevent others from manufacturing similar new tech unless they are licensed with them.
|
True, Samsung can decide to include some components that haven't been fully tested. But then you end up with the faulty GPS of the Galaxy S, and the faulty radios of the Nexus S 4G. I would certainly not call that an advantage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
plea bargain means he makes a deal..no deals the politicians jsut are too afraid to touch him because it can hurt the korean economy..as I said before..korea is one of the onyl countries that avoided recession..anyways this is pointless to our discussion.
|
Plea bargain means he agreed to plead guilty and admit he committed a crime. Anyway, get off that whole "Korea avoided the recession" nonsense. Korea avoided the recession because the entire country is about half the size of a single state in the USA. I'm sure if you only count half of California, they would have skipped the recession too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Cyanogen is a person..he has a team...but he is the one who started it...when he started it he got an HTC device because at the time HTC was only choice for Android...from then on more people added on..Samsung would have been added either way...them giving the device is an EXTRA..not the deciding factor...
|
CyanogemMod is a whole team of people. Clearly, you were wrong in your assesment of the Galaxy S and CM support. They just barely got the first CM7 nightly for a Galaxy S device a couple weeks ago. I posted the link. And this is with a whole team of developers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
... your saying giving developers free phones is playing catchup? its a sign of favorism to the community..this act got them a bunch of people to favor the SGS2 over the Evo 3d..read the comments...its not only about having developers..its also about keeping them..and if the other side has better phones and sends you a free phone in the mail while the other guy doesn't..who would you choose?
|
Man, you realize that hundreds or even thousands of people said they were getting an HTC phone when HTC agreed to open the bootloaders? Liek I said, Samsung is just playing catch up. You can bet there will be more custom ROMs for the HTC phones, just like there always has been. The Samsung is NOT a better phone. If it were, then they wouldn't have to give them away in order to get people to develop for them. It's not like these devs are a bunch of idiots who just don't know any better. They know which phones are the best and they buy the ones they want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
ok..I'll take you on this bet....now before anyone cries fowl..I want to confirm...the bet is "Who sells more phones HTC or Samsung?"..I want you to pay very close attention to the wording so that you dont say anything in the future..if this wording is ok with you then my bet is on Samsung.
|
Yes, HTC will sell more smartphones than Samsung. They will sell a LOT more smartphones than Samsung.
You do realize that the quarterly profits HTC just posted were about half of the quarterly profits Samsung posted in their best quarter ever, for the whole company- not just mobile. So you are out of your mind if you think Samsung is going to compete with HTC in this area. HTC is a MUCH larger phone manufacturer than Sansung.