[gTen]

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

Feel free to list them then. Don;t tell me efficiency matters unless you are going to list the efficiency of both devices. We know the Evo 3D has a higher resolution and glasses free 3D. These are big deals.

1) prefect blacks
2) 60,000+ contrast
3) 4% screen reflect
4) 69 - 83 brightness contrast
5) 2.36 gamma intensity
6) infinite contrast ratio
7) 0 power displaying blacks
1000x faster response time over lcds
9) better viewing angles
10) lower power consumption on all colors except white
11) can operate and lower and higher temperatures then lcds

OLED is the tech after LCDs...right now you see LCD tvs with 3d and etc..2012+ is gonan be the year of OLED TVs..right now OLED TVs cost too much like 10,000$ for a 30" screen...

I don't know how many megapixels they convert at. But I can assure you it is plenty enough for facebook since you keep saying that is the only thing people use their camera for.

I said facebook AND image sites...and as I said HTC has a history of having sub par cameras..where as the SGS 2 has a camera that even beats the iphone 4 and etc..not suprsing as unlike HTC, Samsung actually manufactures cameras!

And you do realize skye isn't showing a 2 megapixel video stream, right? So, again, tell me why the front camera is enough for you to label it an advantage on the sammy when you have never even seen a pic from the HTC. You said it was based on extra megapixels, but I have yet to hear os a use case where those extra megapixels will ever be used by anyone. The thing is designed for video chat which doesn't display nor stream a 2 megapixel video stream.

I know skype right now does not use 1080p video but it will in the near future, and there are techs that do support 1080p video, you also can use it for better self portraits and etc..I mean many things dont support 3d and you have no problems touting that...

It is not VITAL for business, lol. Do you even know what you're talking about? Tell me this: if an IT guy has a hundred devices to prepare and hand out to an entire department, and all of them will be identical... Say he gets a nand backup of the first device. He then tries to restore that nand on the other 99 devices. Will this work on the Sammy? Is that a good thing or bad thing? Do you think this would work on the HTC? Is that a good thing or bad thing?

First of all its optional..second of all...he is not suppose to do nand backups..you have something called "remote syncing"....no one does nand backups in corporate environments...

That is totally fine for them to do. It doesn't give them any advantage though. It's not like Samsung is the only company making components. HTC is free to buy whatever components they want from whoever they want.

Yes they can but you also have to realize that while they can buy components from other sources..other sources dont just go throwing out latest components either..they first release "prototypes" for testing then have the buyers like HTC make orders...Samsung can skip this entire lengthy process and just manufacture it out the gate..thats a HUGE advantage...not to mention Samsung has patents on components they release which prevent others from manufacturing similar new tech unless they are licensed with them.

That is exactly what a plea bargain is. The accused pleads guilty- aka admits he committed a crime. Seriously, every single day countless people in the USA plead guilty and don't go to jail. And the more money you have, the more serious crimes you can get away with.

plea bargain means he makes a deal..no deals the politicians jsut are too afraid to touch him because it can hurt the korean economy..as I said before..korea is one of the onyl countries that avoided recession..anyways this is pointless to our discussion.

I am absolutely not misunderstanding. You clearly don't know what you're talking about. I'll explain below...


First of all, CyanogenMod is a TEAM, not a person. There are several people involved that own many different devices. It's not one person who happens to own this type of phone. Secondly, I never claimed that HTC devices were the ONLY devices supported by Cyanogen. I said the Galaxy S was not. As you can see here:
Samsung Captivate First Galaxy S With Official CM7 Nightly

Cyanogen is a person..he has a team...but he is the one who started it...when he started it he got an HTC device because at the time HTC was only choice for Android...from then on more people added on..Samsung would have been added either way...them giving the device is an EXTRA..not the deciding factor...

Again, HTC already has developer support. They didn't need to do this. All of the major devs out there already have HTC ROMs. Samsung is the one playing catch up here, not HTC.

... your saying giving developers free phones is playing catchup? its a sign of favorism to the community..this act got them a bunch of people to favor the SGS2 over the Evo 3d..read the comments...its not only about having developers..its also about keeping them..and if the other side has better phones and sends you a free phone in the mail while the other guy doesn't..who would you choose?

Care to place a bet on which one sells more? Just because a few people on engadget said they will get the Galaxy S 2 doesn't mean anything. I guarantee HTC will sell a whole lot more phones than Samsung, just like they always do. And there will be plenty of custom ROMs for every one of the HTC phones, just like there always is. Samsung is the one playing catch up here. And how ironic that you said HTC was just catching up, at best, to what every other OEM did several years ago. Clearly, HTC is not the one playing catch up here.

ok..I'll take you on this bet....now before anyone cries fowl..I want to confirm...the bet is "Who sells more phones HTC or Samsung?"..I want you to pay very close attention to the wording so that you dont say anything in the future..if this wording is ok with you then my bet is on Samsung.