Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDynamite
It's not a tie. Clearly, this is a landslide win for the Evo 3D. Higher resolution and glasses free 3D are facts.
|
Super AMOLED Plus has advantages like better black levels, betetr color reproduction, faster refresh...resolution and 3d are not the only spec for screens...
Quote:
|
I disagree. There will be plenty of 3D pics and vids taken. Certainly a lot more than on the Galaxy S 2. And that is a fact.
|
Look..I bet ya 90% of pics taken will be 2d..you do know what when you take a 3d pic it will only be 2 megapixels right?
Quote:
|
Nobody cares about what computers use. Computers don't have data caps, tiny batteries, and limited space.
|
I am pretty sure sprint said no data caps..I dont see how battery matters in this and 32gb + 32gb is more the enough space..even though again I dont see how space effect web video chat...
Quote:
|
No we weren't. We were talking about encryption on the phone. BTW, encrypted nand is a bad thing.
|
um..Ive been telling you from the beginning you misunderstood me and I was talking about different encryption..encrypted nand is what I meant from the beginning..and why is it a bad thing again?
Quote:
I know all about samsung, lol.
Totally false. They are bound to the rules of the ITC and WTO. Not only that, but if they want to sell their products in the USA, they have to play by the rules set forth by the USA. If the feds say no more Samsung products for sale here, game over. See how large that company is after a couple years of being banned from the USA, watching all their competitors take their market share.
They aren't as big as AT&T was when the feds broke that company up.
I know about Samsung.
|
The USA cannot break up samsung..they don't have any authority over it..the only thing the USA can control is Samsung's USA branch..even if Samsung is a monoply the USA cant do a thing...and no international organization is going to break up samsung..neither will the korean government..Korea NEEDS samsung...right now korea is one of the only countries that escaped recession...and Samsung and LG is how they did it...
Quote:
|
That is not the same thing as you are describing. If they run out of parts, that is one thing. If they start using a monopoly to gain an unfair advantage that is another thing entirely.
|
No..samsung said they will not allow anyone to buy super amoled until 18month after Samsung uses them in their products...
Quote:
|
they couldn't get away with it because it is illegal. What they do in Korea is their business. But this isn't Korea we're talking about. If they want to do business in the USA, they have to obey USA laws.
|
The USA does not dictate foreign companies...sure they have to follow USA laws to sell..but being a monopoly in your own country is not against usa law...samsung electronics sells their phones/products here...they sell components in korea..and in korea they do w\e they want...
Quote:
|
That stuff happens all the time in the USA too. Nothing new there. If you're rich enough, you can get away with pretty much anything. We just had the biggest economic disaster since the great depression in the USA. Caused by a group of people who knew what they were doing. They all made boatloads of money on it, and not a single one of them was even charged with a crime. There are countless examples of people getting away with obvious crimes when they have enough money. Believe me, it's not limited to the CEO of Samsung. However, that is not the same thing as an illegal monopoly. Bill gates was literally the richest man in the world and the feds still made Microsoft act like a bunch of independent companies.
|
ok see here is the difference..in USA they werent charge with a crime...that guy was charged with a crime, he pleaded guilty..and they just did a slap on the wrist..I have yet to see anyone pull that off...
---
Edit:
Oh, just tuned to engadget and look here:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/s...evs-a-free-ga/
your gonna tell me HTC did this? cause I'm pretty sure they didn't...