Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
I said its a tie because while higher resolution is nice..Super AMOLED Plus is just that good..the color reproduction is unparalleled...hence why its a tie...I have seen both for myself in CES2011 and thats my opinion on the matter..there is no "fact" to this to claim it one way or the other..in terms of technology super amoled plus is the latest tech...qhd is latest tech..so now all we are talking about is personal opinions..not facts..hence a tie...
|
It's not a tie. Clearly, this is a landslide win for the Evo 3D. Higher resolution and glasses free 3D are facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
But SGS2 has an 8mp camera and one of the best..its an unknown because HTC has a history of sub par cameras..and considering that most people will till take 2d pics over 3d...this may not speak for you in specific..but you know its true...
|
I disagree. There will be plenty of 3D pics and vids taken. Certainly a lot more than on the Galaxy S 2. And that is a fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Most webcams these days are 2mp...mobile to mobile 1.3mp might be enough.. that said mobile -> pc is a different story..thats when you cna make full use of 2mp front camera! and considering even laptops come with 2mp frotn cameras its kinda a standard...
|
Nobody cares about what computers use. Computers don't have data caps, tiny batteries, and limited space.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
We are not talking about that kind of security..we are talking about encrypted nand..and guess who is the biggest seller of nand? ypu samsung..i bet ya if you open evo3d or your evo it will have samsung nand..and if samsung does not sell these encrypted nand to HTC..there is no way HTC will have it...
|
No we weren't. We were talking about encryption on the phone. BTW, encrypted nand is a bad thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Ok..I dont think you realize what Samsung is, let me give you some background...Samsung is a monopoly..to be precise they are a monopoly supported by the federal government..not the US federal government...the Korean government...
|
I know all about samsung, lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
They are located in korea outside the control of the US government..they can do w\e they want and korea allows them...HTC on the other hand is a company in china with no backing whats so ever..
|
Totally false. They are bound to the rules of the ITC and WTO. Not only that, but if they want to sell their products in the USA, they have to play by the rules set forth by the USA. If the feds say no more Samsung products for sale here, game over. See how large that company is after a couple years of being banned from the USA, watching all their competitors take their market share.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Samsung is so HUGE..that if samsung itself was a country they would be the #35th biggest economy in the world..yes they would have bigger GDP then the entire country of Argentina.
|
They aren't as big as AT&T was when the feds broke that company up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
They do everything from cellphones to building those giant ships...they even have a theme parks...
|
I know about Samsung.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
And I'll tell you this.. rememberer the AMOLED incident when HTC had problems supplying AMOLED phones..well samsung effectively kept most of the supply for themselves..they even said super amoled they are keeping to themselves for 18 months..and SGS is known to have components that are never before seen in other devices and not on sale...
|
That is not the same thing as you are describing. If they run out of parts, that is one thing. If they start using a monopoly to gain an unfair advantage that is another thing entirely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Why can they get away with this? aside from being a compete monopoly thats also above the law in korea..they are also one of the biggest component manufacturers and many innovations come from them..and their clients are pissed yes..sony got pissed and is trying to break free of their slcd contract with samsung and move in with sharp, Apple is also complaining...but they got no choice but to deal with samsung if they wish t be competitive..its just that :/
|
they couldn't get away with it because it is illegal. What they do in Korea is their business. But this isn't Korea we're talking about. If they want to do business in the USA, they have to obey USA laws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
|
That stuff happens all the time in the USA too. Nothing new there. If you're rich enough, you can get away with pretty much anything. We just had the biggest economic disaster since the great depression in the USA. Caused by a group of people who knew what they were doing. They all made boatloads of money on it, and not a single one of them was even charged with a crime. There are countless examples of people getting away with obvious crimes when they have enough money. Believe me, it's not limited to the CEO of Samsung. However, that is not the same thing as an illegal monopoly. Bill gates was literally the richest man in the world and the feds still made Microsoft act like a bunch of independent companies.