[gTen]

Originally Posted by BlackDynamite

1: You do not look at facts unbiased. You said the screens were a tie, even though the Evo 3D has a higher resolution and glasses free 3D.

I said its a tie because while higher resolution is nice..Super AMOLED Plus is just that good..the color reproduction is unparalleled...hence why its a tie...I have seen both for myself in CES2011 and thats my opinion on the matter..there is no "fact" to this to claim it one way or the other..in terms of technology super amoled plus is the latest tech...qhd is latest tech..so now all we are talking about is personal opinions..not facts..hence a tie...

You then said the back cameras were unknown even though the Evo 3D has 2 of them and does 3D pics and vids.

But SGS2 has an 8mp camera and one of the best..its an unknown because HTC has a history of sub par cameras..and considering that most people will till take 2d pics over 3d...this may not speak for you in specific..but you know its true...

You then said the front camera was a win for the Galaxy S 2 just because it has a few more megapixels when you have never even seen a pic from the front camera of the Evo 3D, and the extra megapixels are useless in a video chat anyway. You also said 2 megapixels was the standard for video chat, and that is absolutely a crock of bull. Nobody uses a 1080p video chat on a mobile phone.

Most webcams these days are 2mp...mobile to mobile 1.3mp might be enough.. that said mobile -> pc is a different story..thats when you cna make full use of 2mp front camera! and considering even laptops come with 2mp frotn cameras its kinda a standard...

You then read on qualcomm's website that the Snapdragon is secure, and still refused to accept that as a fact. You are absolutely not unbiased. Get that notion out of your head.

We are not talking about that kind of security..we are talking about encrypted nand..and guess who is the biggest seller of nand? ypu samsung..i bet ya if you open evo3d or your evo it will have samsung nand..and if samsung does not sell these encrypted nand to HTC..there is no way HTC will have it...

2: Speaking of all of that, Samsung absolutely does not have a hardware advantage, and the Galaxy S 2 is not superior to the Evo 3D. Get those notions out of your head too. The little theory you have about Samsung having an advantage because of their other components is blatantly false. That is absolutely not how business works. If Samsung was giving themselves a competitive advantage then nobody would buy their components. You can't on the one hand say "Samsung is so big their CEO would never address a wireless issue, it would be the person in charge of wireless." And then on the other hand say, "Samsung wireless can easily get components that nobody else can get because they make them." Do you think AT&T wireless has an advantage because AT&T provides the T1 lines in the area? No. Of course not. Sure, wireless carriers need backhaul. But AT&T would never tell Sprint or Verizon, "We can't provide you with any backhaul right now because we're all out of capacity, due to our own LTE rollout eating up all the space on the fiber lines around here." No way. Not only would the federal government flip out if that was happening for antitrust and monopoly violations, but other businesses in the industry would completely avoid doing any business with them at all costs. If a business has seperate divisions like that, they are required to treat each division the same as they would treat any other business. At my job, different divisions actually bill other departments and things like that. it's not a matter of just saying, "throw all of these chips away, stop any deliveries on any new chips, and bring all the new chips here for our own phones." It's more like, "okay, write these chips off as a loss, even though we have already paid that other department for them, and put in an order for a bunch of the new chips. We'll use the new ones in these devices. It'll cost us, but it has to be done." And yes, I understand that Samsung changed the specs on an unreleased device after seeing a couple new devices. But those were unreleased devices. That type of thing happens all the time. now if that Galaxy Tab had a million units manufactured and several stores and carriers waiting on orders to be delivered, there is no way they would have changed it. If they have only made 10 of them and it isn't set to be released for a long time, yeah, it will probably change before release. And Samsung is absolutely not the only OEM that does that.

Ok..I dont think you realize what Samsung is, let me give you some background...Samsung is a monopoly..to be precise they are a monopoly supported by the federal government..not the US federal government...the Korean government...

They are located in korea outside the control of the US government..they can do w\e they want and korea allows them...HTC on the other hand is a company in china with no backing whats so ever..

Samsung is so HUGE..that if samsung itself was a country they would be the #35th biggest economy in the world..yes they would have bigger GDP then the entire country of Argentina.

They do everything from cellphones to building those giant ships...they even have a theme parks...

And I'll tell you this.. rememberer the AMOLED incident when HTC had problems supplying AMOLED phones..well samsung effectively kept most of the supply for themselves..they even said super amoled they are keeping to themselves for 18 months..and SGS is known to have components that are never before seen in other devices and not on sale...

Why can they get away with this? aside from being a compete monopoly thats also above the law in korea..they are also one of the biggest component manufacturers and many innovations come from them..and their clients are pissed yes..sony got pissed and is trying to break free of their slcd contract with samsung and move in with sharp, Apple is also complaining...but they got no choice but to deal with samsung if they wish t be competitive..its just that :/


I mean look at this:

http://www.switched.com/2008/04/17/s...t-be-arrested/

The Samsung CEO commits fraud..admits he is guilty and won't be arrested..so my answer to you is..yes they can do w\e they want..