Quote:
Originally Posted by gTen
Well yeah Touchwiz base roms are non-sense >.> lol jk
I gave you links that backup my claims and my thought process..you can say w\e you want but I presented facts for both sides whether it agreed to what I was stating or hindered..I have no interest in passing lies as reality..if I feel I made a mistake at any point I correct it. Even if I hate something such as say Apple I won't stand for anyone saying things about it that are false..
Listen to what I have to say just for 1 minute without trying to take sides one way or another..
It is not surprising that Samsung has the advantage in hardware..it has nothing to do with which brand is better or etc..it just that..samsung has an unfair advantage...
Lets stop using Samsung as an example to make it easier and use Qualcomm...imagine Qualcomm decided to start making smartphones..starting 2012...they make a new processor and begin to use that processor to make a new phone in 2012Q1..in 2012Q2 they send a sample processor to HTC, Qualcomm completes their phone in 2012Q3..HTC now has a choice..release old processor to compete or wait till Q4 or 2013Q1 to release with new processor.
Samsung has such an unfair advantage its not even funny.. remember when ipad2 was released and it was thinner then all the others? in 3 days Samsung changed their complete design to be thinner then the ipad..also the SGS2 was originally suppose to be 1ghz..once they heard qualcomm plans to release phone in Q3 with 1.2ghz they bumped their entire SGS2 line to 1.2ghz in 2 days...
This has nothing to do with being loyal to a brand..samsung makes like 70%+ of the components inside their own phones..they can swap them easily whenever they please..HTC does not have that luxury..as they make contracts with component suppliers and can't break them even if they wanted to..
|
1: You do not look at facts unbiased. You said the screens were a tie, even though the Evo 3D has a higher resolution and glasses free 3D. You then said the back cameras were unknown even though the Evo 3D has 2 of them and does 3D pics and vids. You then said the front camera was a win for the Galaxy S 2 just because it has a few more megapixels when you have never even seen a pic from the front camera of the Evo 3D, and the extra megapixels are useless in a video chat anyway. You also said 2 megapixels was the standard for video chat, and that is absolutely a crock of bull. Nobody uses a 1080p video chat on a mobile phone. You then read on qualcomm's website that the Snapdragon is secure, and still refused to accept that as a fact. You are absolutely not unbiased. Get that notion out of your head.
2: Speaking of all of that, Samsung absolutely does not have a hardware advantage, and the Galaxy S 2 is not superior to the Evo 3D. Get those notions out of your head too. The little theory you have about Samsung having an advantage because of their other components is blatantly false. That is absolutely not how business works. If Samsung was giving themselves a competitive advantage then nobody would buy their components. You can't on the one hand say "Samsung is so big their CEO would never address a wireless issue, it would be the person in charge of wireless." And then on the other hand say, "Samsung wireless can easily get components that nobody else can get because they make them." Do you think AT&T wireless has an advantage because AT&T provides the T1 lines in the area? No. Of course not. Sure, wireless carriers need backhaul. But AT&T would never tell Sprint or Verizon, "We can't provide you with any backhaul right now because we're all out of capacity, due to our own LTE rollout eating up all the space on the fiber lines around here." No way. Not only would the federal government flip out if that was happening for antitrust and monopoly violations, but other businesses in the industry would completely avoid doing any business with them at all costs. If a business has seperate divisions like that, they are required to treat each division the same as they would treat any other business. At my job, different divisions actually bill other departments and things like that. it's not a matter of just saying, "throw all of these chips away, stop any deliveries on any new chips, and bring all the new chips here for our own phones." It's more like, "okay, write these chips off as a loss, even though we have already paid that other department for them, and put in an order for a bunch of the new chips. We'll use the new ones in these devices. It'll cost us, but it has to be done." And yes, I understand that Samsung changed the specs on an unreleased device after seeing a couple new devices. But those were unreleased devices. That type of thing happens all the time. now if that Galaxy Tab had a million units manufactured and several stores and carriers waiting on orders to be delivered, there is no way they would have changed it. If they have only made 10 of them and it isn't set to be released for a long time, yeah, it will probably change before release. And Samsung is absolutely not the only OEM that does that.