Quote:
Originally Posted by jcase
Why would someone PM Ziggy asking, after he already told us publicly that it was not available? How does that make sense at all? The source posted does not seem to match ANY kernel he posted, and does not properly build as-is.
Where did anyone complain about needing source to all of them? (I may have missed this)
No one ever targeted Ziggy specifically, we pipe'd up on a point, that many of us do when we see this happening. Refusal to comply is different than not having source available publicly. He did both.
Your points are invalid. Cleaning up this thread would serve no purpose other than to hide a chain of events. It should be preserved for public record.
|
Because PM'ing him directly for contact rather then having the possibility of posting in a thread and it being missed seems like a smart idea to me. Its what i would do.
Cleaning up would have the posts moved out to there own thread.
"You sir are wrong, there is not matching source (at the time of these postings) to his kernel that is publicly available. There is no source on his site, that matches the kernels he has posted. Similar source, original source, source from another kernel does not constitute compliance."
This is the tree that every single one of those kernels came from.
You asked for the source tree, you got the source tree. You got the source tree in mid update. So you have a newer source tree then the posted kernel. All of the posted kernels were built from this source tree and so will be the next one.
It is what it is and at this point if you are still not happy then go do what you have to do.
What are you aiming for. Pulling down the links to the kernels until he posts this build?
And like i said, if you had contacted him directly, or even in this thread because he did see it just hadn't been free long enough to get back to you. The source was available.
That is how i got it.