View Single Post
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2011, 12:50 PM
jcase's Avatar
jcase
Lurker
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
Reputation: 0
jcase is a n00b
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [Kernel] Ziggy471 MECHA BETA Kernel UPDATED 3 May 11

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. X View Post
Sending him a pm would have been much more efficient then asking in the thread and getting angry if it gets over looked or ignored for what ever reason.

So now your complaining that he hasn't posted source separately for every single change in kernel revision. so the recent source that all those kernels derived from is not good enough eh?

If this isn't something personal then you got some work lined up for yah. I can find dozens of threads on XDA that have archived kernel and Roms with said kernels that the source has been updated for and no longer "current for the posted source"

Shall we launch a full blown movement in general. Or are we just after Ziggy right now.

Hell the CM rom i'm running has a kernel that the publicly posted source is no longer available for. it doesn't exists it has been assimilated by the currently up to date source.

So are we good here now? Because i'd like to clean up this thread and get it back on topic.

The source is now up. Any further discussion is to be done in PM to Ziggy or who ever else you wish to contact about this.
Why would someone PM Ziggy asking, after he already told us publicly that it was not available? How does that make sense at all? The source posted does not seem to match ANY kernel he posted, and does not properly build as-is.

Where did anyone complain about needing source to all of them? (I may have missed this)

No one ever targeted Ziggy specifically, we pipe'd up on a point, that many of us do when we see this happening. Refusal to comply is different than not having source available publicly. He did both.

Your points are invalid. Cleaning up this thread would serve no purpose other than to hide a chain of events. It should be preserved for public record.
Reply With Quote