[iceblue]

While I understand the difference from theory and real world, especially being a mechanic, I also understand the fundamental basis of the theory of operation of 802.15 concluding all available possible variances. Though the basis of the theory can not be denied the subjection of operation can conclusively be challenged. IEEE wireless technology is the basis of my conclusion and that of which I derive my personal opinion basis from. You and everyone else in the forum is completely and legitimately capable of developing there own comprehensive opinions based how they feel.

Your real world testing may also be within the scope of theory of operation and in accordance of your personal opinion including personal opinions derived from other users and other users acting upon themselves. However my physical testing and experience on this subject using a ppc-6800 with Motorola S9 show in accordance to my opinion based upon the theory of operations found from IEEE 802.15 as well.

This does not prove or disprove that one of us is right and the other is wrong. It only shows the basis of an optimized working order is purely up for subjective values. While I thank you for your input and feel it is valid as well, I would just like to share my hypotenuse of operation on this matter with the community.

I do not feel the issue is sully represented from the MS9 itself or the HTC 6800. While the operational flaw can be masked buy increasing one or more individual components in the phone or MS9 it does not address the core fundamental functionality flaw of the product. Where I believe the issue lies but not proven is within the RAM/ROM chip itself and not the operation of the MS9 or the 802.15.4 chipset.

Lack of RAM found in the ppc-6800 may cause memory stacks to occur in excessive levels causing write/retrieve times to become excessively high from the ROM to the RAM and from the RAM to the ROM making playback during seeks and or stacks choppy. While this can be masked by increasing FSB levels and core frequency’s over the chipsets entirety and pipe line or the audio cards RAM dack itself I still believe the bottle neck present is not the chipsets entirety or pipe line but within the ROM/RAM.

This is seen by reviewing the HTC 6900 showing that the 6900 and the 6800 share the same chipset pipeline “Qualcom 7500” but not the same ROM/RAM chipset. While they claim changes in the 802.15 the theory’s shown on this product dictate this would do little to nothing. Where as addressing the ROM/RAM chipset would do something but would mean very little to non educated users making marketing much more appeasable to just make a needless change to 802.15 and base the improvements on the directly relevant product.

Thank you
Chris Scott.