View Single Post
  #629 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2011, 11:14 AM
arrrghhh's Avatar
arrrghhh
Testing Extraordinaire
Offline
Threadstarter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,604
Reputation: 7360
arrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [TESTING] Updated 4/4/11 New Kernel - Minor Fixes...

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidwolf908 View Post
Any way I can find the 4.2.11 kernel to download? I don't see it in the paperclip for the thread and the latest ZIP pack has the 4.4.11 kernel.
What do you want old kernels for? We're looking forwards, not backwards!

The whole point of testing is to... test. Report back. If you have issues, go back to autobuild kernels. K?

I'd also appreciate it if others did not repost old kernels. Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ndno View Post
I'm back to using FRX06 and this kernel is running great. I'm no longer using a dedicated ext2 partition on the SD card; I see no benefits from my testing using it; it actually feels a little sluggish using a ext2 partition . So I'm back using a mount loop for the data.img (better quadrant scores if it means anything) . Like others, I'm still getting the kb lock while typing.

Arrrghhh, I just switched to jonpry's files for the better battery meter patch. He said the kernel is based off wiltist2 latest; however I see a lot more kernel messages on bootup on it than the one you posted here. .. probably not much different if any but just wondering.
Yea the only real benefit of running dedicated ext2 partition seems to be the 'partial' USB mass storage, and I think hyc said the errors are more localized? The fsck errors we get from the data.img that is.

Oh and jonpry means that he has the same battery saving/panel collapse patches WisTilt2 has - it's not necessairly built off of WisTilt2's kernel, it's actually based from the autobuild - again, with some patches .
Reply With Quote