View Single Post
  #1153 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:13 PM
natemcnutty's Avatar
natemcnutty
VIP Member
Offline
Threadstarter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 845
Reputation: 3070
natemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIPnatemcnutty is still contributing even after becoming a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes

Quote:
Originally Posted by [ACL] View Post
I posted the difference yesterday between the partition tables, look at the pastebins.

also my vbin diff shows differences between the imgfs.bin. Looks like we use xpr while dzo uses lzx for compression. So how are you comparing your emptyimgs ?
Crap, you're right! I renamed the damned file when I was messing around with compiling tinboot and compared it to itself... Just downloaded them directly off the gits and compared with HxD, and I do see the differences from 0x2C to 0x32:
Code:
IMGFS.BIN: 4C 5A 58 00 82 46 02
EMPTYIMG:  58 50 52 00 FE C2 01
Unfortunately, my battery is dead at the moment, and I have to let it fully charge before I can flash these test tinboots. I might get lucky and be able to try this tonight. If not, tomorrow morning when I get in to work, I have a folder with 4 different tinboots to try out in order of least to most brick risk :P
Reply With Quote