[[ACL]]

Originally Posted by natemcnutty

they are just using a blank imgfs which they are including at the end of tinboot:

kernel:
        .incbin "zImage"
initrd:
        .incbin    "initrd.lzma"
        .align
fin:
        .org XIP_END-0x20000,0xff
        .incbin "emptyimgfs"

I'll break down their imgfs and compare it with ours. I'll also dig a little deeper into the os.payload, but I really don't think that part matters for much of anything since the XIP is what we care about (since it contains the tinboot code).

I'll gladly try flashing the vogue's partition table and blank imgfs like they do it. Like I said, my phone is fairly useless with the USB being broken. I have to keep it on a charger almost all day long because the pins are broken inside keeping the current flowing through the USB all day long...

EDIT: OK, I just broke down and compared the hex of the blankimgfs from Vogue and our imgfs.bin, and they are identical.

Now I just have to figure out the difference between the partition table from Vogue and our os.nb.payload file. I believe that is the only difference between what we are doing and what they are doing. And like DZO said, they had to use a tiny partition table to only use one cell. Seems we should be able to do the same thing, so I'm going to try it.

I posted the difference yesterday between the partition tables, look at the pastebins.

also my vbin diff shows differences between the imgfs.bin. Looks like we use xpr while dzo uses lzx for compression. So how are you comparing your emptyimgs ?