[0ri0n]

Originally Posted by bradart

This is an interesting question. You see, when a being of a certain cognizant fortitude recognizes its own existence, initially it accepts and thrives on this fact. Eventually, though, when left to its own intellectual devices, the being, because of its reliance on contingency of logical constructs, begins to question whether or not the initial assumption of relative independence can, in fact, be correct. It is best to approach the question from an outside stance, asking not "Is my sentience a product of my own cognitional appropriations?" but, instead "is the quality of my intellectual interactions among other sentient beings hindered by the idea that i may be the result of their projective sub-intelligencia?" By asking this, you take in to account that the sole purpose of the question is not to define one's own existence, but rather to decide whether or not one exists at all. The mind cannot be fooled into thinking that it is thinking so, therefore, the fact that you exist, regardless of construct, mental architecture, or matrix of generation, is the important note to take away.

Yeah... my head is hurting from that one... or it it really pain... what if.. its... euphoria... wait... does that exist... do i exist... i think i need another blue pill...

Originally Posted by bradart

Also, WHAT THE F%#$ IS A CELL PHONE?!

*sings* Meow Meow Meow Meow... Meow Meow Meow Meow... Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow...