Thread: CLOSED, Lt. Sense 2.5.[2012|2016|2018], WM6.[5|5.x], MaxSense, Titanium
View Single Post
  #643 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2010, 07:41 PM
O.a.T.'s Avatar
O.a.T.
VIP Member
Offline
Threadstarter
Location: Albuquerque
  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 566
Reputation: 4205
O.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributionsO.a.T. should be added to the payroll for their contributions
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Oct. 20, Lt. Sense 2.5.[2012|2016|2018], WM6.[5|5.x], MaxSense, Titanium
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.a.T. View Post
I've built 2 new roms based on 2.5.2016; one with WinMo 21683 and the other with 23144. Both are 6.5.3, use the latest AKU, and reportedly seem to have similar performance. Sabroso has volunteered to test 21683. Anyone want to test 23144 using the same metrics he posted earlier for 21681, along with other observations? This would be quite helpful for me in terms of finalizing on a sys, while the community would benefit in general.
No takers huh? Disappointing.

This thread is closed, i.e., I won't be looking at it further. In stead my new thread, although not completed, is open.
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.