Quote:
Originally Posted by eric12341
they gave the HD7 a 6,
|
Well have you considered it could be a 6? Remember they had like 5 phones to compare to at the same time...I guess the HD7 just failed to compare to the rest.
"The Bad:
Questionable build quality
Poor viewing angles, contrast, color reproduction
Small battery for its size"
They gave it 1,230mAh battery while standard id say is 1500mah...poor viewing angles on a big screen is usually a bad thing..and from what I'm reading HD2 has a lot better build quality...
Quote:
|
the HD2 a 5, what kind of mierda is that? i hate to see what they gave the TP2
|
"Outdated Windows Mobile OS
Lack of compelling applications
Could be too big for some users"
See the thing is when HD2 came out.there was an overall hate with "winmo" in general because it had no decent app store and M$ pretty much stated "we are releasing wm6.5 just to buy time till 7"..also at the time 4.3" screen was not something ppl were used to...remember what makes winmo good is not its "Stock" but once its hacked by the community...also when they tested it initially it was extremely buggy and they rate it at the time based on the average consumer perspective...
This is actually one thing I disagree with engadget..when giving a rating they should give it an initial rating and then a rating after 1-2 month.
Also..for the TP2 if you look back Engadget actually liked it: (They didnt give ratings at the time though)
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/h...ever-could-be/