Quote:
Originally Posted by Maan76
comparison of 21680 and 21679 in different speed parameters (including graphics) .
21679
Integer;480.1321;Moves/25 usec
Floating point;11.216;MWIPS
RAM access;664;Speed index
Draw bitmaps;1109;Speed index
Main storage (write);2494.52;KB/sec
Main storage (read);7202.81;KB/sec
Storage Card (write);4781.32;KB/sec
Storage Card (read);5885.06;KB/sec
File List;2927;Items/s
FL: Storage Card;3427;Items/s
loading;3852;ms
21680
Integer;466.6308;Moves/25 usec
Floating point;10.885;MWIPS
RAM access;671;Speed index
Draw bitmaps;1113;Speed index
Main storage (write);2641.44;KB/sec
Main storage (read);6508.47;KB/sec
Storage Card (write);4504.40;KB/sec
Storage Card (read);6934.54;KB/sec
File List;1816;Items/s
FL: Storage Card;3153;Items/sec
loading;4394;ms
note : test conducted on a pp of 16 which gave me the highest results for both ROMs .
conclusion :both ROM versions are fast but 21679 is a little bit faster ,which obviously is (I noticed that even before running the benchmark test).
I am going to stay with it until NRGZ releases something beat it .
|
I never cared much for benchmarks but your results piqued my interest. Could you list your test environment? I compared your SKTools results to mine and they are rather different. You are obviously overclocking, but to what speed, which ROM, AC/batt, anything disabled?
I don't have 61679 tests (I'll flash it and run tests when I do the next ROM flash). I ran three tests on the 21680.cookie2.Sep.29 ROM: Stock, OC @729 w/o Sense, OC @729 w/ Sense:
Regardless of the results, I still think that 21680 feels faster than 21679. Synthetic benchmark results doesn't always translate into the same user experience. Any benchmarks should be taken with a grain of salt.