Thread: [Kitchen] WVGA Touch Pro 2 Collaboration
View Single Post
  #4116 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:44 AM
Sharkie405's Avatar
Sharkie405
VIP Member
Offline
Location: Waynesville, NC
  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,612
Reputation: 11155
Sharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation levelSharkie405 can't get a higher reputation level
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [Kitchen] WVGA Touch Pro 2 Collaboration
A quick question if I may,

I'd been running my 6.5.X ROM all week on a page pool of 12. With that I get about 44% memory after soft reset, give or take. 44 would be an average. I'd been running twelve after most people in my thread said that 12 was the ideal number for them.

Yesterday I changed the same ROM to a page pool of 0. With it set at 0 I was starting off with an average of only 33% free memory after boot up.

This blew my mind. I guess I just never paid attention before. I'd been running my personal ROM at 0 for a long time now. One of the post on the first page suggest running it at the "dynamic" 0. Why is that?

These numbers are using MMTaskManager and WM Memory. I didn't check with anything else yet. I know that different apps will give you different readings, but I kind of assume an increase or decrease would probably be the same across the board more or less, just with different starting points.

Why did you guys recommend setting a page pool at 0 when it consumes so much more memory to do so? Am I missing something? Are these readings not really truthfull?
__________________
Current Device:
Verizon HTC One M9
Reply With Quote