Quote:
Originally Posted by nerys
no back pedalling no obfuscating. Nothing I have said has changed. You just keep bringing up irrelevant things or quirks so YOU can obfuscate.
I make an argument someone says show it I show it and instead of saying OK your right they come up with the stupid "catch all" we can change contract anytime we want.
SO why ask in the first place?
|
The entire point is that your argument is irrelevant. You seem to keep missing this. It doesn't matter if your gasoline argument sways anyone: the contract, as it is worded, makes it incredibly clear that you do not have a leg to stand on. It's not just the catch-all: go read my posts again. Sprint included multiple provisions to ensure it could do exactly what it is doing now. You asked, and I quote, "show me in my contract where it says I can't activate any phone I want." And I did. I did just that, using a subscriber agreement from two-thousand-five: well before you ever got SERO.
You can rage and scream about how this is unfair and how it's unreasonable and how other companies were punished for it: all irrelevant. You asked for something specific, you were shown in very clear terms the very thing you kept demanding to see. And yet you never once conceded it; instead you immediately began calling the validity of the contract itself into question.
No one here can make a summary judgment on the validity of that contract.
Would it be right for a gasoline provider to charge you more for gas in a lamborghini than a ford? In principle, no--
but if you knowingly and willingly signed a contract that gave them the right to do it, hey, they have the ability to do so. You have no right within the confines of that contract to protest. Your only recourse is to get a higher power to invalidate the contract, and there is no one on this board with the power to do so.