Quote:
Originally Posted by nerys
I never once that I can recall said it was illegal. If I did it was and error in typing and RARE and directly corrected in many many many of my posts.
I said IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.
I cited examples of a company doing something SIMILAR in the past and getting SPANKED for it (AOL)
as for the 8330vs8530
SERVICE WISE. wifi does not use sprint data. Ram? woopee everything goes on the internet card anway.
and my 8330 sure as hell had 3g.
same screen nearly the same hardware same os same capabilities same data usage save radio (cellular) same resolution etc.. etc.. etc.. etc..
there will be ZERO data usage difference between these phones because there is NOTHING the 8530 can do on sprints network that the 8330 can not also do equally as well and in fact using the exact same software.
name ONE THING the 8530 can do on sprints network that the 8330 can not?
|
You do realize you're just running around in circles, right?
"Show me where my contract says [blah]" -- Done. So rather than concede the point, you then run to:
"No, this is unreasonable, companies shouldn't be allowed to do this." -- Addressed because your definition of unreasonable is pointless: either get a court to agree with you or stop, because by now it's clear enough people here don't agree with you that your arguments are falling on deaf ears.
"Well it should be unreasonable, no one has addressed my gasoline argument" -- Which leads us right back to the contract issue.
Just stop, nerys. It's now getting to the point where you're just backpedaling and obsfuscating in an attempt to avoid admitting failure. Just let it go; you can't win them all. This is the Internet: once I finish posting, I will go and do things that matter. So will (probably) everyone else. It's not that important who won or lost on an internet forum.