I am entitled to what I paid for. What I paid for was a $42 a month service that I can use any TECH compatible phone with.
Sprint is taking that away without cause.
The fact that you consider this to be me having entitlement issues is
ing and scary.
MPAT - while it is interesting that you feel that way about sero customers (how are we different than any other customer?)
besides that animosity you have you are 100% correct
So let me ask all you guys this.
Lets say your paying for your nice expensive $69.99 plan and 3 years from now the "normal" price for this service some how becomes $99.99
sprint decides to FORCE people to goto the $99.99 plan by making all NEW PHONES that are cool and desirable unavailable to anyone on the $69.99 plan "just because" not because they are tech incompatible.
Will you then proclaim that those $69 accounts are whiners and have entitlement issues? how would it be ANY different.
Sprint made an offer and then wants to renig on that offer and so takes actions that are without cause to FORCE people to change.
again if sprint was DROPPING all 1x and 3g service and switching wholesale to 4g and decided this new network costs more.
OK thats fine. I could understand that. Sprint does not "owe me" access to the new network.
That is not the case here. They are doing this for ONE REASON. to force people to give up their grandfathered accounts without cause.
you can scream moan and proclaim and decree all you want we are whiners and have entitlement issues but it does not change this is WRONG.
Period