Ill try and get some comparison shots between the evo, pre, and tp2 tommorow if i remember, for a DIRECT comparison. my 1st impression is the cam aint as bad as i thought, im not impressed with it but seems like it might do
--------------------------------------------------
here is a quick comparison in LOW LIGHT.
its not pretty, but this is more real world
what you will see while shooting indoors with
sunlight peeking through the blinds and some
artificial light mixed in. brace yourself
EVO
Pre
They are both horrible quality, BUT to me
looks like the pre camera captured a little
more detail, and didnt blowout all the highlights
making my son's face unrecognizable. I will give
the EVO the edge on smoothness though,
little less artifacts but less detail too, kinda weird
No cam phone performs well in low light BUT HTC
is notorious for being HORRIBLE in it. The EVO really
struggled here, i had to keep trying to snap shots
because the evo's shutter speed DETERIORATED,
the palm would take the pic and the evo would take
so long that my son would move it it'd be a blurry
mess. This is why i was so anti HTC int he beginning
of this thread, not all of your pics are gonna be taken
outside in bright sunlight
not trying to slay the evo here just being blunt and honest.
Is it a dealbreaker? Hell no, but so many people in here
looked at me crazy when i mentioned the pre camera as
if it was really worse than htc cams, had to a do a sanity
check for myself