View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2010, 09:42 AM
Cicatrize's Avatar
Cicatrize
ѕнρ ѕоfтшаяє
Offline
Location: Michigan
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,160
Reputation: 2505
Cicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIPCicatrize is a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Well.. this sucks for EVO 4G owners to be (including me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merovingian View Post
Hesse is on record saying that wimax wouldn't cost any more than current 3G service. Wimax IS costing you $10/month more on the Evo 4G and I suspect on any other wimax phone from now on.

No one is referencing the cost of 4g devices but rather the $10 fist job Sprint is tacking on the Evo just because it has 4G.
I'm getting tired of saying this.

Sprint is NOT CHARGING THE $10 BECAUSE THE PHONE HAS 4G. Why can't people get this? It's for premium data. AT&T did this same thing with the iPhone because they knew people would use more data on it, and people didn't bitch this much, even though it was $30 extra for "iPhone data".

Dan Hesse didn't lie. You people are just trying to find someone to blame, and I bet the $10 charge wasn't even his idea.
__________________
HTC EVO 4G - Fresh 0.3
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.