View Single Post
  #18296 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 01:08 AM
swlaraut's Avatar
swlaraut
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Location: Oregon
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 417
Reputation: 1590
swlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on repswlaraut is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: (¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.- 'Energy' |May 16| 21903|23569 -.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanmv213 View Post
Regarding the HTC_performace cab that claimed it could overclock our processor from the native 520mhz to 624mhz, I've got some results from the spb benchmark utility that Boushh suggested earlier. I haven't read the spb forum thoroughly to dissect the results but maybe this screenshot of four different setups can help the community to determine if this cab is giving us almost 20% more cpu power. I originally did this on NRGZ's 23569 cookie 051610 ROM and I am with Sprint. I also ran the utility on the 21903 which returned a higher SPB Benchmark index rating if anyone is interested.
Interesting. Unless the results are labeled wrong, it would seem that the tweek actually slows down the phone. Go figure.
Reply With Quote