[quickstang]

While I have SERO too, and am not in a 4G market yet, I wonder what they will do about that? If one doesn't travel and they are paying for something that is not available, that is NOT fair.

For 6 months that could be an extra $60 I dished out if I dont see the 4G in my area until that time. When it is here and I had that phone, I would probably pay. I think Sprint is going to have to look at this closely.

I dont know about you, but I myself would refuse to pay that if I cant use it.

On another note about SERO.... One of these days it will be gone. I have a feeling that we have one of the last phones that we can use it on. While everyone is talking about how they are going to keep it and not switch, that is fine for now, but at some point you'll have no choice.

Sprint CAN and WILL make it go away by saying you have to use phones with certain plans. And in a matter of time, none will be available for SERO.

BTW... If someone has a Twitter account, they should ask the data question to Sprint and see what they come back with. Ask how they see it fair to pay $10 more per month if you dont travel and 4G is NOT in your market. And they cant pull that...eventually it will be in all markets BS cause until it is, you shouldn't pay for what you dont have.