[WarChild]

Originally Posted by SaltyDawg

No hurt feelings man, lol. Okay, tell me this before we put this to bed...

Verizon is known for having the largest network. They are not known for being cheap.
AT&T is known for having the iPhone, and having a large GSM network. They are also not known for being cheap.
T-Mobile is known for being cheap.
Sprint is known for being cheap.

We can see why Verizon and AT&T would beat Sprint. Some people prefer larger networks or want an iPhone. So it's no surprise that Verizon and AT&T would beat Sprint every quarter, even though Sprint is cheaper. they both have some pretty significant advantages over Sprint in other areas, even though Sprint is cheaper.

Why would T-Mobile beat Sprint every quarter? If T-Mobile really has no advantage over Sprint, why would they consistently kill Sprint every quarter (adding lots of customers while Sprint loses lots, and making tons of money while Sprint loses tons)? Sprint has the larger network, so if it is really faster and cheaper like you say, then it makes no sense why T-Mobile would consistently win every single quarter.

There must be some pretty significant advantages that T-Mobile offers, that you aren't giving them credit for. There are. They are plans (cost and contract requirements), phone selection, technology (GSM, SIM cards, etc), and customer service.

they definitely beat Sprint (you got me) but I, in FL, do better on Sprint but when I went to Michigan I had no Data and was Roaming the whole time. Im giving them credit but they just dont fit my cell phone usage like Sprint does soley for the unlimited-to-moble which is what I use the most. My bestest friend uses AT&T and has the iPhone and like every 3rd or 4th call he makes here in Fl gets disconnected.




CW