Quote:
Originally Posted by raidzero
and why is malrom like twice as high as all the others? seems like when there is one piece of data that is totally inconsistent with the others it should be reconsidered?
|
Interesting question, I was thinking the same thing. I use the example benchmark score and it looks like a single test which are throwing off the average composite score
Mighty actually showed better across the board except that one test!
- Arkaball
- Mighty 141 fps
- Mal 71 fps
- Directory listing
- Mighty 1104 ms
- MalRom 366 ms
Here's a reverse sort of the Mighty times vs the Malrom times (more neg=Mighty faster):
Graphics -149% Arkaball -95% Read -28% Write -16% Memory -15% Write -14% CPU -14% CPU -14% CPU -14% Copy -13% Decompress -12% Copy -11% Graphics -10% Compress -9% Graphics -7% Internal -3% Read -1% Directory 67%