Quote:
Originally Posted by vaxick
I'm saying one program works much faster in general at spotting them than the other. With Visual GPS I'm getting a signal in a matter of seconds and with Holux I have to wait.
BTW, Visual GPS is using less than 60k of memory while running in the background.
|
Hmm, the Holux one is pretty instant for me so there was no reason for me to try something else, what's the CPU usage of Visual GPS when running in the background?