View Single Post
  #179 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:42 PM
Maxx134's Avatar
Maxx134
VIP Member
Offline
Location: NYC
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,272
Reputation: 4320
Maxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributions
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolloLoco View Post
Excellent work CopyCounsler.....

Finally, Maxx134 asserted that the previously stated lower clockspeeds in PHM are superior to 624 in XCPUscalar. Is that through benchmarking I assume?
Yes you can use TCPMP and select file/benchmark to verify.

Both the : (546Mhz,273b,137m,68lcd) AND the (572Mhz,286b,143m,72lcd)
are faster simply because of the higher Bus speed than stock208..

None of my 3 refurbs were ever able to reach 624Mhz though, so for newer refurbs this seems to be the best setting.

If you have Xcpuscalar or PHM and want to experience less process/ram, and Ma overhead while overclocked, you also can try this:

Connect 6700 to USB external power (either to comp or power supply)
Run your favorite overclock program
Set highest stable speed.
Close overclock program
Run "CPU-ID".(to verify still overclocked while plugged in)
I do this whenever synced and also when using "Internet Sharing"
I havent measured sync performance but it is faster

Your unit reverts back to normal when you disconnect from external power...

Last edited by Maxx134; 01-24-2008 at 09:48 PM.
Reply With Quote