View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:08 PM
watson540's Avatar
watson540
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 56
Reputation: 5
watson540 is a n00b
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I fully agree with OP. the camera on my phone is so shitty that its insulting. why would htc do us like this? how can they claim its a 2mp camera?!

very insulting to pay 500 for a phone only to have it wasted on junk that no one bothered to test before releasing it upon a trusting public.


and yes..im quite sure that my 1 year old daughter could draw a better picture than the mogul takes. I've taken hundreds of would be photos on this phone and maybe 5 turned out legible. and if you don't have good lighting then forget about.

built in flash? I call bullshit. its good for a flashlight and that's it. I feel very annoyed at being suckered by falsified claims that the mogul has a camera

I would explain the so called camera as 'a cool gadget no one wants to pay for on a phone. this gadget captures various arrays of light and puts them in a speciall random blurry pattern that scarcely resembles what you were pointing the gadget at'

who takes a camera under 3.8 MP seriously anyway? not me..but I would expect to at least get a legible 320x240 picture. suitable for a postage stamp....

meh.I could ramble all day
Reply With Quote