View Single Post
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2008, 01:18 AM
MannyPR's Avatar
MannyPR
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
Location: Indianapolis
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 210
Reputation: 85
MannyPR is becoming a great contributor
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I might not be board certified and my posts are not legal advice to anyone nor I have presumed to do so. I was a law student in my earliest years and know some about trade law because that is what the firm I worked for did.

Trade libel is the intentional disparagement of the quality of property. "Unlike classic defamation, [the defamatory statements] are not directed at the plaintiff[base ']s personal reputation, but rather at the goods a plaintiff sells or the character of his or her business, as such." Guess v. Superior Court , 176 Cal.App.3d 473, 479 (1985). The disparagement must result in pecuniary damage to the plaintiff. The disparagement may be in the form of a false statement of fact or opinion. (see 5 Witkin Sum. Cal. Law Torts §573, citing Rest.2d, Torts §§626)

Research those cases and research the Lanham Act, I think you will be surprised how wrong your assumptions are. Besides your post is OT.