View Single Post
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2007, 12:42 AM
MannyPR's Avatar
MannyPR
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
Location: Indianapolis
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 210
Reputation: 85
MannyPR is becoming a great contributor
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by klurf8881 View Post
also funny how you base it one ONE persons testament, boy i can list numbers off my "buddy" told me too- "hey its lab tested 1050mah!!! my buddy tested it in a lab too!!" (not that im saying hes a liar, just anyone can say anything- its the freakin internet dont trust everything u see at face). Being here 3 months doesnt and actively bashing another user (post #70) doesnt make someone more credible in my book, just less. Ill wait for some solid reliable evidence is posted like a scan of a results sheet not someone making a lot of big claims everyone's just supposed to believe at face.
I don't care of you believe it or not, I got the test done for my own use and decided to share the results that I was given. Take it with a grain of salt if you must. My facts are that the batteries tested performed as expected, I can't talk about yours and that I am enjoying the extended battery life that I was offered when I purchased them. That's it for me, I just can't believe that our geek community got their panties all bunched up over some data given by a single software running in a completely uncontrolled environment without even talking to the programmer to see if it was compatible with the Touch.